Fæstningens Materialgaard, Copenhagen. Photo by Sarah Armitage
Case

Copenhagen: Modern retrofitting of a historic buildning

In Copenhagen, Denmark, a recent study led by Realea, an organisation that purchases historic and modern buildings that serve “the common good,” investigators explored the degree to which sustainable building technologies can be applied to listed buildings without detracting from their historic value. Now the results of that study will be tested as the buildings in the Fæstningens Materialgård complex, located at Frederiksholms Canal, are retrofitted to reduce CO2 emissions.


Investigators have used the renovation of the Fæstningens Materialgård, a cluster of buildings which played an important role in the expansion of Copenhagen’s defenses at the end of the 18th century and which are now protected by Denmark’s Heritage Agency, to study how to reduce a structure’s CO2 emissions without compromising its historic value. Since these buildings are now used as offices, investigators not only had to address issues of historic preservation and environmental sustainability, but also to create an attractive working environment.

The process began at the discussion table. Representatives of different groups—landlords, technical engineers, construction engineers, conservation architects, and conservation authorities—gathered to consider possible renovations from a variety of different perspectives. Participants were forced to articulate not only which retrofits they found acceptable but also why they held certain opinions. After a year’s work, they had narrowed their initial list to a set of renovations that would be acceptable to all. The thoroughness and high quality of the discussions make the project’s first phase particularly notable.

Fæstningens Materialgaard, Copenhagen. Photo by Sarah Armitage

Investigators then used a simulation model to determine the reductions in CO2 emissions that would result from the proposed renovations. They concluded that they could achieve 20 percent lower emissions per person using the office space (12 to 13 percent lower emissions overall), even as they improved indoor air quality significantly. After the opportunity arose to use a district cooling system for the building complex, investigators found that they could increase emissions reductions to 40 percent per occupant (approximately 25 percent overall).

Those renovations will now be made to the buildings at Fæstningens Materialgård, and the projections of the initial study will be tested by measuring CO2 emissions after the project has ended. In general, investigators have agreed to renovations that cannot be seen. Thus waterborne cooling systems were acceptable but not airborne cooling systems, replacing window glass but not entire windows, sealing building gaps but not installing exterior insulation, a centralized control system but not rooftop solar panels. The entire renovation project will be completed in two phases, the first beginning in fall 2009 and the second in fall 2010.

The study at Fæstningens Materialgård and the subsequent renovation should prove that it is possible to make substantial reductions in CO2 emissions without detracting from a building’s historic value and that even protected buildings can contribute to the goal of CO2 neutrality. Nevertheless, certain retrofits, most notably the installation of a centralized control system, would be difficult to justify in economic terms. If, however, the price of electricity continues to climb, even a centralized control system would become a sound investment for ordinary house-owners.

Javascript is required to view this map.

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <h3> <h4> <hr> <hr/> <p> <img> <br> <br/> <br /> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <sub> <sup>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Sorting

Sorting

Making the Change

Key Learning Points

The interdisciplinary collaboration of architects, engineers, preservationists, and property mangers made it possible to consider issues of environmental sustainability while renovating a listed building. Though the involvement of different groups meant that the process took longer, the solution promises to be more thorough as a result.

Most of the energy efficiency measures adopted require only basic technologies—more efficient window glass, for example.  

Decision makers were careful to consider the full repercussions of their actions. While installing additional interior insulation may have seemed an obvious choice, participants in the preliminary discussions realized that the energy conserved from trapping more indoor heat during the winter would be more than offset by the additional energy needed to cool the building in the summer. When evaluated in full, installing additional interior insulation would actually be counterproductive. As Realea’s representative in these early discussions noted, “it always pays to sit down and think.”

Process

2006: Realea purchases the Fæstningens Materielgård complex.
Spring 2008: Realea begins addressing which energy conservation measures can be adopted without detracting from the buildings’ historical value.
Fall 2009: Realea begins the first phase of the Fæstningens Materielgård renovation. The second phase will begin in fall 2010.
Fall 2011: The Fæstningens Materielgård renovation is expected to be completed.

Facts

City Facts

Country: Denmark
City: Copenhagen
Area: 88.25 km2 (city)
Population: 530, 902 (city, 2010)
Population density: 6,015.9/km2
GDP per capita (country): USD 36,000 (2009 est.)

Project facts

In Denmark, buildings that have been “listed” as preservation-worthy by the national Heritage Agency are exempt from mandatory energy efficiency improvements. This recent Realea study proves that it is possible to reduce the CO2 emissions in listed buildings by 20 percent without compromising their historic value. Thus even listed buildings can play a role in achieving ambitious goals such as carbon neutrality.

At Fæstningens Materialgård, this 20 percent reduction in CO2 emissions (measured per building occupant) could be achieved even as significant improvements were made to indoor air quality. With the addition of a district cooling system, emissions reductions could be increased to 40 percent.

Facts for Thought

It takes about 65 years for an energy efficient new building to save the amount of energy lost in demolishing an existing building, and many new buildings are not built to last much longer than 65 years. Thus many so-called “green” new building are actually more wasteful than the structures that they replace. Often the most sustainable solution involves the reuse of existing buildings in new and imaginative ways.

At the same time, it is also true that even the most advanced retrofits cannot compete with the energy efficiency technologies that are possible with new construction. We will ultimately need new buildings to offset the inherent inefficiencies of old ones, with existing buildings proving an essential interim solution as we move towards more sustainable communities. The study at Fæstningens Materialgård proves that even protected buildings can contribute to energy efficiency improvements and carbon dioxide reductions.

Media

Google Map

a:2:{s:4:"zoom";s:1:"5";s:7:"latlong";s:29:"55.85064987433714,11.07421875";}


Dig this

Case: Hammarby Sjöstad: Integrated sustainability as a main focus

 In the planning of Hammarby-Sjöstad, integrated sustainability has been a key component.

Fact/Quote

“The number of people dying from diarrhoeal diseases is equivalent to twenty fully-loaded jumbo jets crashing every day, with no survivors.”
1st UN World Water Development Report, 2003

Back to top